<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TGRWT #11: Pork tenderloin with banana and cloves</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.khymos.org/2008/10/27/tgrwt-11-pork-tenderloin-with-banana-and-cloves/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.khymos.org/2008/10/27/tgrwt-11-pork-tenderloin-with-banana-and-cloves/</link>
	<description>- dedicated to molecular gastronomy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 23:21:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://blog.khymos.org/2008/10/27/tgrwt-11-pork-tenderloin-with-banana-and-cloves/comment-page-1/#comment-111140</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.khymos.org/?p=478#comment-111140</guid>
		<description>Yesterday I sous-vided for the first time: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/photos/fotoosvanrobin/3044488540/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;chickenbreast&lt;/a&gt;.
So now I&#039;m looking for more recipes and came across this one.
I was wondering, as a newby in sous-vide cooking, it says &quot;leave meat to rest&quot;, but is that necessary when you only cook it at 60 °C?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday I sous-vided for the first time: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/fotoosvanrobin/3044488540/" rel="nofollow">chickenbreast</a>.<br />
So now I&#8217;m looking for more recipes and came across this one.<br />
I was wondering, as a newby in sous-vide cooking, it says &#8220;leave meat to rest&#8221;, but is that necessary when you only cook it at 60 °C?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blog.khymos.org &#187; Blog Archive &#187; TGRWT #11 round-up</title>
		<link>http://blog.khymos.org/2008/10/27/tgrwt-11-pork-tenderloin-with-banana-and-cloves/comment-page-1/#comment-111057</link>
		<dc:creator>blog.khymos.org &#187; Blog Archive &#187; TGRWT #11 round-up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 19:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.khymos.org/?p=478#comment-111057</guid>
		<description>[...] tenderloin with banana and cloves by Khymos Verdict: I enjoy the combination of sweet and salty tastes in the banana sauce. I goes very well [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tenderloin with banana and cloves by Khymos Verdict: I enjoy the combination of sweet and salty tastes in the banana sauce. I goes very well [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alessio</title>
		<link>http://blog.khymos.org/2008/10/27/tgrwt-11-pork-tenderloin-with-banana-and-cloves/comment-page-1/#comment-111027</link>
		<dc:creator>Alessio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.khymos.org/?p=478#comment-111027</guid>
		<description>Did you try to blend the marinate? The more evenly coating should favour the flavour release.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you try to blend the marinate? The more evenly coating should favour the flavour release.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Lersch</title>
		<link>http://blog.khymos.org/2008/10/27/tgrwt-11-pork-tenderloin-with-banana-and-cloves/comment-page-1/#comment-111021</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Lersch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 19:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.khymos.org/?p=478#comment-111021</guid>
		<description>Banana and chicken - yum! But the sweetness should probably be balanced with salt and acidity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Banana and chicken &#8211; yum! But the sweetness should probably be balanced with salt and acidity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://blog.khymos.org/2008/10/27/tgrwt-11-pork-tenderloin-with-banana-and-cloves/comment-page-1/#comment-111018</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 12:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.khymos.org/?p=478#comment-111018</guid>
		<description>Did you have any specific reason for the choice of pork rather than some other meat (or bird?). Would this go well with types of meat that are commonly served with sweet garnishes, such as game or bird, or would this be too much taken the sweetness in the meat itself?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you have any specific reason for the choice of pork rather than some other meat (or bird?). Would this go well with types of meat that are commonly served with sweet garnishes, such as game or bird, or would this be too much taken the sweetness in the meat itself?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh Hancock</title>
		<link>http://blog.khymos.org/2008/10/27/tgrwt-11-pork-tenderloin-with-banana-and-cloves/comment-page-1/#comment-111017</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh Hancock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 09:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.khymos.org/?p=478#comment-111017</guid>
		<description>Nice! Interesting that the tenderloin didn&#039;t take up much banana flavour - do you think that was a factor of time, or is it that for some reason the aromatics aren&#039;t susceptible to being absorbed by the meat? Perhaps a slightly fattier cut, like a chop or something?

Yeah, I think &quot;to sous-vide&quot; has definitely become allowable as a verb at this point - the alternative is &quot;then cook them sous-vide&quot;, which just seems redundant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice! Interesting that the tenderloin didn&#8217;t take up much banana flavour &#8211; do you think that was a factor of time, or is it that for some reason the aromatics aren&#8217;t susceptible to being absorbed by the meat? Perhaps a slightly fattier cut, like a chop or something?</p>
<p>Yeah, I think &#8220;to sous-vide&#8221; has definitely become allowable as a verb at this point &#8211; the alternative is &#8220;then cook them sous-vide&#8221;, which just seems redundant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Lersch</title>
		<link>http://blog.khymos.org/2008/10/27/tgrwt-11-pork-tenderloin-with-banana-and-cloves/comment-page-1/#comment-111016</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Lersch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 06:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.khymos.org/?p=478#comment-111016</guid>
		<description>I realized now yes :) I did get your email but only labelled it TGRWT and put it aside for the roundup. I didn&#039;t actually check the recipe in detail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I realized now yes <img src='http://blog.khymos.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  I did get your email but only labelled it TGRWT and put it aside for the roundup. I didn&#8217;t actually check the recipe in detail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry P.</title>
		<link>http://blog.khymos.org/2008/10/27/tgrwt-11-pork-tenderloin-with-banana-and-cloves/comment-page-1/#comment-111014</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 03:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.khymos.org/?p=478#comment-111014</guid>
		<description>Hey! I submitted pork tenderloin with banana and clove 3 weeks ago! Guess we&#039;re thinking alike (yet different) on this one. Definitely not done the same way. It&#039;s cool to see that someone else thought of the combination and in a completely different way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey! I submitted pork tenderloin with banana and clove 3 weeks ago! Guess we&#8217;re thinking alike (yet different) on this one. Definitely not done the same way. It&#8217;s cool to see that someone else thought of the combination and in a completely different way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

